Diagnosis of malaria can be difficult:
Where malaria is not endemic any more (such as the United States), health care providers are not familiar with the disease. Clinicians seeing a malaria patient may forget to consider malaria among the potential diagnoses and not order the needed diagnostic tests. Laboratorians may lack experience with malaria and fail to detect parasites when examining blood smears under the microscope.
In some areas, malaria transmission is so intense that a large proportion of the population is infected but not made ill by the parasites. Such carriers have developed just enough immunity to protect them from malarial illness but not from malarial infection. In that situation, finding malaria parasites in an ill person does not necessarily mean that the illness is caused by the parasites.
In many malaria-endemic countries, lack of resources is a major barrier to reliable and timely diagnosis. Health personnel are undertrained, underequipped and underpaid. They often face excessive patient loads, and must divide their attention between malaria and other equally severe infectious diseases such as pneumonia, diarrhea, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS.
Clinical Diagnosis
Clinical diagnosis is based on the patient's symptoms and on physical findings at examination.
The first symptoms of malaria (most often fever, chills, sweats, headaches, muscle pains, nausea and vomiting) are often not specific and are also found in other diseases (such as the "flu" and common viral infections). Likewise, the physical findings are often not specific (elevated temperature, perspiration, tiredness).
In severe malaria (caused by Plasmodium falciparum), clinical findings (confusion, coma, neurologic focal signs, severe anemia, respiratory difficulties) are more striking and may increase the suspicion index for malaria.
Thus, in most cases the early clinical findings in malaria are not typical and need to be confirmed by a laboratory test.
"Presumptive Treatment"In highly endemic areas (particularly in Africa), the great prevalence of asymptomatic infections and lack of resources (such as microscopes and trained microscopists) have led peripheral health facilities to use "presumptive treatment". Patients who suffer from a fever that does not have any obvious cause are presumed to have malaria and are treated for that disease, based only on clinical suspicion, and without the benefit of laboratory confirmation. This practice is dictated by practical considerations and allows the treatment of a potentially fatal disease. But it also leads frequently to incorrect diagnoses and unnecessary use of antimalarial drugs. This results in additional expenses and increases the risk of selecting for drug-resistant parasites. |
Microscopic Diagnosis
Malaria parasites can be identified by examining under the microscope a drop of the patient's blood, spread out as a "blood smear" on a microscope slide. Prior to examination, the specimen is stained (most often with the Giemsa stain) to give to the parasites a distinctive appearance. This technique remains the gold standard for laboratory confirmation of malaria. However, it depends on the quality of the reagents, of the microscope, and on the experience of the laboratorian.
more: Diagnosis (Microscopy)
Alternate methods for laboratory diagnosis include:
Antigen Detection
Various test kits are available to detect antigens derived from malaria parasites. Such immunologic ("immunochromatographic") tests most often use a dipstick or cassette format, and provide results in 2-15 minutes. These "Rapid Diagnostic Tests" (RDTs) offer a useful alternative to microscopy in situations where reliable microscopic diagnosis is not available. Malaria RDTs are currently used in some clinical settings and programs. However, before malaria RDTs can be widely adopted, several issues remain to be addressed, including improving their accuracy; lowering their cost; and ensuring their adequate performance under adverse field conditions. The World Health Organization's Regional Office for the Western Pacific (WHO/WPRO) provides technical information, including a list of commercially available malaria RDTs, at http://www.wpro.who.int/rdt/.
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first RDT for use in the United States. This RDT is approved for use by hospital and commercial laboratories, not by individual clinicians or by patients themselves. It is recommended that all RDTs are followed-up with microscopy to confirm the results and if positive, to quantify the proportion of red blood cells that are infected. The use of this RDT may decrease the amount of time that it takes to determine that a patient is infected with malaria.
more: Diagnosis (Rapid Diagnostic Test)
Molecular Diagnosis
Parasite nucleic acids are detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This technique is more accurate than microscopy. However, it is expensive, and requires a specialized laboratory (even though technical advances will likely result in field-operated PCR machines).
Related Source: Molecular Diagnosis of Malaria and Babesiosis
Other techniques related to malaria diagnosis are:
Serology
Serology detects antibodies against malaria parasites, using either indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serology does not detect current infection but rather measures past experience.
more: Serology
Drug Resistance Tests
Drug resistance tests are performed in specialized laboratories to assess the susceptibility to antimalarial compounds of parasites collected from a specific patient. Two main laboratory methods are available:
• In vitro tests: The parasites are grown in culture in the presence of increasing concentrations of drugs; the drug concentration that inhibits parasite growth is used as endpoint;
• Molecular characterization: molecular markers assessed by PCR or gene sequencing allow also the prediction, to some degree, of resistance to some drugs; however, the predictive values of these molecular tests are still being evaluated.
Information for The General Public
Malaria can be a severe, potentially fatal disease (especially when caused by Plasmodium falciparum) and treatment should be initiated as soon as possible.
In endemic areas, the World Health Organization recommends that treatment be started within 24 hours after the first symptoms appear. Treatment of patients with uncomplicated malaria can be conducted on an ambulatory basis (without hospitalization) but patients with severe malaria should be hospitalized if possible.
In areas where malaria is not endemic, all patients with malaria (uncomplicated or severe) should be kept under clinical observation if possible.
Patients who have severe P. falciparum malaria or who cannot take oral medications should be given the treatment by continuous intravenous infusion.
In some countries (but not the United States) some antimalarial drugs are found in suppository form.
Several antimalarial drugs are available for treatment by continuous intravenous infusion.
Most drugs used in treatment are active against the parasite forms in the blood (the form that causes disease) and include:
chloroquine
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (Fansidar®)
mefloquine (Lariam®)
atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone®)
quinine
doxycycline
artemisin derivatives (not licensed for use in the United States, but often found overseas)
In addition, primaquine is active against the dormant parasite liver forms (hypnozoites) and prevents relapses. Primaquine should not be taken by pregnant women or by people who are deficient in G6PD (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase). Patients should not take primaquine until a screening test has excluded G6PD deficiency.
How to treat a patient with malaria depends on:
The type (species) of the infecting parasite
The area where the infection was acquired and its drug-resistance status
The clinical status of the patient
Any accompanying illness or condition
Pregnancy
Drug allergies, or other medications taken by the patient
Report a serious drug side effect
If you have had a serious side effect while taking a drug, you or your health care provider can report that side effect to the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MedWatch is the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program.
Alternatively, health care providers can report to the FDA...
• by phone (1-800-FDA-1088)
• or fax (1-800-FDA-0178)
The advantage to having your health care provider file the report is that he/she can provide clinical information based on your medical record that can help the FDA evaluate the report.
However, for a variety of reasons, you may not wish to have the form completed by your provider, or the provider may not wish to complete the form. Your health care provider is not required to report to the FDA. In this case, you may complete the online reporting form at www.fda.gov/medwatch/report/consumer/consumer.htm* yourself via the Internet.
Counterfeit and Substandard Drugs
Counterfeit and substandard drugs are sold in some areas and should be avoided.
* | Note: These sites are not CDC sites and will be opened in a new browser window. CDC is not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these links. Links to nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not indicate an endorsement of these organizations by CDC. |